At over 175 pounds of gentle legal muscle, Otter Levin, Esq. is the legal heavyweight you want in your corner—but maybe not on your couch. Known affectionately as “The Slobberator”, Otter specializes in slobber liability, splash zone rights, and pawsonal space violations, particularly those involving large dogs with even larger hearts (and jowls).
In undergraduate at the University of Pawntana, Otter played left tackle and anchored an All-American offensive line. At the University of Pawntana he earned All-American Honors 28 (4 x 7) years in a row. He is the Pawntana Paw of Fame for having taken out more knees on a sweep than Jimbo Covert did for the Chicago Bears.
A graduate of Big Bark Law School, Otter made a splash—literally and legally—during the famous Flooferson v. Water bowl case, which redefined the boundaries of acceptable drool displacement in public spaces. Otter doesn’t drink water, he eats it. His toughness isn’t just in the water bowl but also in drinking water from the toilet. There he is capable of slobbering down 4 flushes of water with his teeth and tongue in a matter of 60 seconds. It doesn’t stop there. Otter then takes his wet jowls and quickly ruins couches, pants, shirts, and rugs in a mere 30-second time frame. His speed and ability to disperse water throughout a house is unmatched by a Newfoundland in North America. Otter’s oral skills are truly unique. He knows that Newfoundlands have been unfairly accused of causing slips on marble floors and stains on couches. Otter understands their plight and the lack of rights they have received by owners and pet enforcement departments across the US. He was able to successfully defend a Newfoundland who was improperly sued by an owner’s guest for a dry cleaning bill of their formal gown that had an 18 x 12 inch slobber stain on it. The guest presented the formal gown and stain to the jury without any forensic testing being done on that dress. Otter cross-examined the guest on the fact that she had no proof that the saliva and drool on that gown was the same as the same saliva and drool of the accused defendant, Newfie. The case was tried before a jury of 6 Newfies, 4 St. Bernards and 2 Labradors. The jury barked “not guilty” after 1 minute of serious deliberations. The Foredog of the jury was interviewed and said, “Otter showed the lack of proof by that cat owning guest and we just felt this was a witch hunt.” The Foredog went on to say, “when you come to bark court, you better have proof of whose drool it is.”
His areas of practice include:
When he’s not lawyering, Otter enjoys swimming in water bowls, leaning against unsuspecting strangers, and napping on furniture he’s not technically allowed on.
Call Otter. Justice has never been so fluffy—or wet.
